Gordon.et.a_2025_Enviro.Res.Comm_Data.csv
  • Description

    In fire-prone forests of south-east Australia, rainforests have longer fire-return-intervals than the dominant and adjoining eucalypt forests, because rainforests occur in topographic positions which are typically too wet to burn. Thus, rainforests often act as natural barriers to fire spread. Although rare, severe drought can make rainforests available to burn, and this can promote very large and intense wildfires by increasing fuel availability across landscapes. Here, we explore how ten fuel moisture indices impact wildfire occurrence in rainforest patches of south-east Australia, when compared with wet and dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest types which are drier and have shorter fire-return-intervals. Vapour pressure deficit was the strongest and most ubiquitous moisture index predicting wildfire occurrence across all forest types, followed by soil moisture and live fuel moisture. Vapour pressure deficit thresholds facilitating a wildfire probability >0.5 also did not differ between forest types. However, the percentage of days exceeding vapour pressure deficit thresholds increased from rainforests to wet eucalypt forests and peaked in dry eucalypt forests. Collectively, our results suggest that the same fuel moisture thresholds promote wildfire in rainforests and fire-prone eucalypt forests; however, wildfire is less common in rainforests because they experience less time in a dry combustible state. Our results provide a framework to forecast wildfire probability across wet and dry forests at large spatial scales. The data was used to conduct statistical analyses and for data visualisation within the manuscript: "Fuel moisture moderates wildfire resistance in rainforests of south-east Australia".


    • Data publication title Gordon.et.a_2025_Enviro.Res.Comm_Data.csv
    • Description

      In fire-prone forests of south-east Australia, rainforests have longer fire-return-intervals than the dominant and adjoining eucalypt forests, because rainforests occur in topographic positions which are typically too wet to burn. Thus, rainforests often act as natural barriers to fire spread. Although rare, severe drought can make rainforests available to burn, and this can promote very large and intense wildfires by increasing fuel availability across landscapes. Here, we explore how ten fuel moisture indices impact wildfire occurrence in rainforest patches of south-east Australia, when compared with wet and dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest types which are drier and have shorter fire-return-intervals. Vapour pressure deficit was the strongest and most ubiquitous moisture index predicting wildfire occurrence across all forest types, followed by soil moisture and live fuel moisture. Vapour pressure deficit thresholds facilitating a wildfire probability >0.5 also did not differ between forest types. However, the percentage of days exceeding vapour pressure deficit thresholds increased from rainforests to wet eucalypt forests and peaked in dry eucalypt forests. Collectively, our results suggest that the same fuel moisture thresholds promote wildfire in rainforests and fire-prone eucalypt forests; however, wildfire is less common in rainforests because they experience less time in a dry combustible state. Our results provide a framework to forecast wildfire probability across wet and dry forests at large spatial scales. The data was used to conduct statistical analyses and for data visualisation within the manuscript: "Fuel moisture moderates wildfire resistance in rainforests of south-east Australia".


    • Data type dataset
    • Keywords
      • Fuel moisture
      • Moisture threshold
      • Rainforest
      • Vapour pressure deficit
      • Wet forest
      • Wildfire hazard/risk
    • Funding source
      • Australian Research Council
    • Grant number(s)
      • - LP190100436
    • FoR codes
      • 310308 - Terrestrial ecology
      SEO codes
      Temporal (time) coverage
    • Start date
    • End date
    • Time period
       
      Spatial (location,mapping) coverage
    • Locations
    • Related publications
    • Related website
        Name
      • URL
      • Notes
    • Related metadata (including standards, codebooks, vocabularies, thesauri, ontologies)
    • Related data
        Name
      • URL
      • Notes
    • Related services
        Name
      • URL
      • Notes
      Citation Gordon, Christopher (2025): Gordon.et.a_2025_Enviro.Res.Comm_Data.csv. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28426199.v1